Archives

Categories



"A vine bears three grapes – the first of pleasure, the second of drunkenness and the third of repentance."

- Anacharsis, Scythian philosopher, 6th Century BC

OmahaSteaks.com, Inc.

Appetizerstogo.com

2009 Beaujolais Nouveau Revisited

Back in December I wrote about tasting a 2009 Georges Duboeuf Beaujolais Nouveau Villages. At that time I did not like the wine (as others attested at the time – my favorite being the review that called it tasting like “banana candy mixed in with a little finger nail polish” – See Back to Work!!!).

At the time I hypothesized that maybe the bottle just needed a little more time to age. Well back to my local liquor store to pick up another bottle, where the proprietor told me that Beaujolais Nouveau tasting yeasty is a very common complaint. He also pointed out that the “cork” was synthetic – so the wine would probably taste exactly the same.

He was right. First sniff and taste – yeast! A lot of it. Hiding the fruitiness of the wine.

So theory number 2 – how ’bout decanting? Decant it I did, letting it sit for about an hour. This helped a lot. While there were still traces of yeastiness, the fruit was much more evident. The wine was still only ok, but the decanting definitely helped.

I am, however, starting to think that the whole Beaujolais Nouveau concept is misguided. It sounds good on paper – a simple, fruity, young wine meant to be enjoyed young. The execution, for me, never lives up to the billing. I always get a young wine that tastes like it just barely finished fermenting that would have benefited from a little more care and aging. A couple more months of aging before bottling would probably do the wine a world of good… But then it wouldn’t be Nouveau, it would just be Beaujolais…

Bookmark and Share
VN:F [1.8.8_1072]
Rating: 0.0/10 (0 votes cast)

Leave a Reply

 

 

 

You can use these HTML tags

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

*
To prove you're a person (not a spam script), type the answer to the math equation shown in the picture. Click on the picture to hear an audio file of the equation.
Click to hear an audio file of the anti-spam equation

Meta